Lipps–Meyer law
The Lipps–Meyer law, named for Theodor Lipps (1851–1914) and Max Friedrich Meyer (1873–1967), hypothesizes that the closure of melodic intervals is determined by "whether or not the end tone of the interval can be represented by the number two or a power of two",[1] in the frequency ratio between notes (see octave).
"The 'Lipps–Meyer' Law predicts an 'effect of finality' for a melodic interval that ends on a tone which, in terms of an idealized frequency ratio, can be represented as a power of two."[2]
Thus the interval order matters — a perfect fifth, for instance (C,G), ordered ⟨C,G⟩, 2:3, gives an "effect of indicated continuation", while ⟨G,C⟩, 3:2, gives an "effect of finality".
This is a measure of interval strength or stability and finality. Notice that it is similar to the more common measure of interval strength, which is determined by its approximation to a lower, stronger, or higher, weaker, position in the harmonic series.
The reason for the effect of finality of such interval ratios may be seen as follows. If is the interval ratio in consideration, where is a positive integer and is the higher harmonic number of the ratio, then its interval can be determined by taking the base-2 logarithm (3/2=7.02 and 4/3=4.98). The difference of these terms is the harmonic series representation of the interval in question (using harmonic numbers), whose bottom note is a transposition of the tonic by n octaves. This suggests why descending interval ratios with denominator a power of two are final. A similar situation is seen if the term in the numerator is a power of two.[3][4]
Sources
- ^ Meyer, M.F. (1929). "The Musician's Arithmetic", The University of Missouri Studies, January.
- ^ Robert Gjerdingen, "The Psychology of Music", (2002). The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory, Th. Christensen ed., p.963. ISBN 978-0-521-62371-1.
- ^ Krumhansl, Carol L. Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch. New York: Oxford UP, 2001. 122. Print
- ^ Wright, David. Mathematics and Music. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 2009. 53. Print.
- v
- t
- e
- Biomusicology
- Cognitive musicology
- Cognitive neuroscience of music
- Culture in music cognition
- Evolutionary musicology
- Psychoacoustics
- Absolute pitch
- Auditory illusion
- Auditory imagery
- Background music
- Consonance and dissonance
- Deutsch's scale illusion
- Earworm
- Embodied music cognition
- Entrainment
- Exercise and music
- Eye movement in music reading
- Franssen effect
- Generative theory of tonal music
- Glissando illusion
- Hedonic music consumption model
- Illusory continuity of tones
- Levitin effect
- Lipps–Meyer law
- Melodic expectation
- Melodic fission
- Mozart effect
- Music and emotion
- Music and movement
- Music in psychological operations
- Music preference
- Music-related memory
- Musical gesture
- Musical semantics
- Musical syntax
- Octave illusion
- Relative pitch
- Sharawadji effect
- Shepard tone
- Speech-to-song illusion
- Temporal dynamics of music and language
- Tonal memory
- Tritone paradox
- Aesthetics of music
- Bioacoustics
- Ethnomusicology
- Hearing
- Melodic intonation therapy
- Music education
- Music therapy
- Musical acoustics
- Musicology
- Neurologic music therapy
- Neuronal encoding of sound
- Performance science
- Philosophy of music
- Psychoanalysis and music
- Sociomusicology
- Systematic musicology
- Zoomusicology
- Jamshed Bharucha
- Lola Cuddy
- Robert Cutietta
- Jane W. Davidson
- Irène Deliège
- Diana Deutsch
- Tuomas Eerola
- Henkjan Honing
- David Huron
- Nina Kraus
- Carol L. Krumhansl
- Fred Lerdahl
- Daniel Levitin
- Leonard B. Meyer
- Max Friedrich Meyer
- James Mursell
- Richard Parncutt
- Oliver Sacks
- Carl Seashore
- Max Schoen
- Roger Shepard
- John Sloboda
- Carl Stumpf
- William Forde Thompson
- Sandra Trehub
- Music Perception
- Musicae Scientiae (journal)
- Musicophilia
- Music, Thought, and Feeling
- Psychology of Music (journal)
- The World in Six Songs
- This Is Your Brain on Music